4.8 Article

Non-Lithographic Fabrication of All-2D α-MoTe2 Dual Gate Transistors

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 18, 页码 3146-3153

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201505346

关键词

-

资金

  1. NRF (NRL program) [2014R1A2A1A01004815]
  2. Nano Materials Technology Development Program [2012M3A7B4034985]
  3. Creative Materials Discovery Program through NRF - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2015M3D1A1068061]
  4. Yonsei University (Future-leading Research Initiative) [2014-22-0168]
  5. KIST Institution Program [2E26420, 2V04010]
  6. Brain Korea 21 plus Program
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M3A7B4034985, 2015M3D1A1068061, 2014R1A2A1A01004815] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As one of the emerging new transition-metal dichalcogenides materials, molybdenum ditelluride (alpha-MoTe2) is attracting much attention due to its optical and electrical properties. This study fabricates all-2D MoTe2-based field effect transistors (FETs) on glass, using thin hexagonal boron nitride and thin graphene in consideration of good dielectric/channel interface and source/drain contacts, respectively. Distinguished from previous works, in this study, all 2D FETs with alpha-MoTe2 nanoflakes are dual-gated for driving higher current. Moreover, for the present 2D dual gate FET fabrications on glass, all thermal annealing and lithography processes are intentionally exempted for fully non-lithographic method using only van der Waal's forces. The dual-gate MoTe2 FET displays quite a high hole and electron mobility over approximate to 20 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) along with ON/OFF ratio of approximate to 10(5) in maximum as an ambipolar FET and also demonstrates high drain current of a few tens-to-hundred mu A at a low operation voltage. It appears promising enough to drive organic light emitting diode pixels and NOR logic functions on glass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据