4.8 Article

Covalent Bond Scission in the Mullins Effect of a Filled Elastomer: Real-Time Visualization with Mechanoluminescence

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 48, 页码 9063-9074

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201602490

关键词

chemiluminescence; elastomers; mechanochemistry

资金

  1. Council for Chemical Sciences of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (CW-NOW) [726.011.002]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the Netherlands [024.001.035]
  3. NSF [CHE-1124694, CHE-1508566]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strain-induced light emission from mechanoluminescent cross-linkers in silica-filled poly(dimethylsiloxane) demonstrates that covalent bond scission contributes significantly to irreversible stress-softening upon the initial extension, known as the Mullins effect. The cross-linkers contain dioxetanes that emit light upon force-induced bond scission. The filled elastomer emits light in cyclic uniaxial tension, but only on exceeding the previous maximum strain. The amount of light increases with hysteresis energy in a power law of exponent 2.0, demonstrating that covalent bond scission becomes increasingly important in the strain regime studied. Below 100%-120% strain, corresponding to energy absorption of (0.082 +/- 0.012) J cm(-3), mechanoluminescence is not detectable. Calibration of the light intensity indicates that by 190% strain, less than 0.1% of the dioxetane moieties break. Small but significant amounts of light are emitted upon unloading, suggesting a complex stress transfer to the dioxetanes mediated by the fillers. Pre-strained material emits light on straining perpendicularly, but not parallel to the original tensile direction, demonstrating that covalent bond scission is highly anisotropic. These findings show that the scission of even a small number of covalent bonds plays a discernible role in the Mullins effect in filled silicone elastomers. Such mechanisms may be active in other types of filled elastomers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据