4.5 Article

Modeling Two-Phase Debris Flows With Grain-Fluid Separation Over Rugged Topography: Application to the 2009 Hsiaolin Event, Taiwan

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JF004671

关键词

grain-fluid mixture; debris flow; rugged topography; terrain-following coordinate system; Hsiaolin landslide

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [WA 2610/3-1, MOST 106-2911-I-006-522]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Landslides or debris flows usually arise in mountainous areas and slide over a rough topography. As the flow body is typically a mixture of particles and interstitial fluid, this paper aims at developing a binary mixture model and its numerical implementation for shallow debris flows on rugged topography. The mathematical formulation of this saturated solid-fluid mixture is developed with respect to a terrain-fitted coordinate system. Employing the thin layer assumption, a system of depth-integrated equations is derived, where the interstitial fluid is supposed to be a viscous Newtonian fluid and the granular material is treated as a frictional Coulomb-like continuum. At the basal surface, the Coulomb sliding condition for the granular constituent and Navier slip for the fluid phase are applied. The interaction between granular material and interstitial fluid is depicted by the buoyancy and a drag force induced by the velocity difference of both the phases. Numerical investigations are performed for studying the features of the proposed model, where a shock-capturing nonoscillatory scheme is employed. A thorough parameter study of flows over three idealized terrain geometries illustrates the distinct impacts of the applied material parameters on the flow dynamics and deposit shapes. The phase separation such as the solid-phase-dominated flow front and how this changes with parameter values are presented. The simulation of the Hsiaolin landslide successfully retraces the approximate flow path recognized in satellite images as well as the measured deposition given in Kuo et al. (2011, ).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据