4.7 Article

A Rapid and Low-Cost Pathogen Detection Platform by Using a Molecular Agglutination Assay

期刊

ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 1485-1494

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00447

关键词

-

资金

  1. VOR, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid and low-cost pathogen diagnostic approaches are critical for clinical decision-making procedures. Cultivating bacteria often takes days to identify pathogens and provide antimicrobial susceptibilities. The delay in diagnosis may result in compromised treatment and inappropriate antibiotic use. Over the past decades, molecular-based techniques have significantly shortened pathogen identification turnaround time with high accuracy. However, these assays often use complex fluorescent labeling and nucleic acid amplification processes, which limit their use in resource-limited settings. In this work, we demonstrate a wash-free molecular agglutination assay with a straightforward mixing and incubation step that significantly simplifies procedures of molecular testing. By targeting the 16S rRNA gene of pathogens, we perform a rapid pathogen identification within 30 min on a dark-field imaging microfluidic cytometry platform. The dark-field images with low background noise can be obtained using a narrow beam scanning technique with off-the-shelf complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) imagers such as smartphone cameras. We utilize a machine learning algorithm to deconvolute topological features of agglutinated clusters and thus quantify the abundance of bacteria. Consequently, we unambiguously distinguish Escherichia coli positive from other E. coli negative among 50 clinical urinary tract infection samples with 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Furthermore, we also apply this quantitative detection approach to achieve rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing within 3 h. This work exhibits easy-to-use protocols, high sensitivity, and short turnaround time for point-of-care testing uses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据