4.5 Article

Effect of salinity and waterlogging on growth, anatomical and antioxidative responses in Mentha aquatica L.

期刊

ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-016-2137-3

关键词

Waterlogging; Salt stress; Mentha aquatica; Antioxidant activity; Growth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salinity and waterlogging are two stresses which in nature often occur simultaneously. In this work, effects of combined waterlogging and salinity stresses are studied on the anatomical alteration, changes of enzymatic antioxidant system and lipid peroxidation in Mentha aquatica L. plants. Seedlings were cultured in half-strength Hoagland medium 50 days after sowing, and were treated under combination of three waterlogging levels (well drained, moderately drained and waterlogging) and NaCl (0, 50, 100, 150 mM) for 30 days. Moderately drained and waterlogging conditions induced differently aerenchyma formation in roots of M. aquatica salt-treated and untreated plants. Moreover, stele diameter and endodermis layer were also affected by salt stress and waterlogging. Salt stress significantly decreased growth, relative water content (RWC), protein level, catalase (CAT) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activities, and increased proline content, MDA content, H2O2 level and activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POX), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). Waterlogging in salt-untreated plants increased significantly growth parameters, RWC, protein content, antioxidant enzyme activity, and decreased proline content, H2O2 and MDA levels. In salt-treated plant, waterlogging caused strong induction of antioxidant enzymes activities especially at severe stress condition. These results suggest M. aquatica is a waterlogging tolerant plant due to significant increase of antioxidant activity, membrane stability and growth under water stress. High antioxidant capacity under waterlogging can be a protective strategy against oxidative damage, and help to salt stress alleviation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据