4.7 Article

Phylogenetic connection among close genera of Aphanizomenonaceae (Cyanobacteria): Amphiheterocytum gen. nov., Cylindrospermopsis and Sphaerospermopsis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2018.11.026

关键词

Cyanobacteria; Nostocales; Phylogeny; Polyphasic studies; Shallow lakes; Rapid light curve

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [FAPESP 2012/06850-3, FAPESP 2012/16430-1]
  2. Federal Government of Brazil through CAPES [Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior]
  3. Ministry of Education, Brazil, through CAPES [Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior]
  4. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [CNPq 303572/2017-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aphanizomenonaceae is a recently proposed family of Cyanobacteria encompassing 12 planktic genera. The formation and distribution of heterocytes and akinetes along the trichome are the main morphological characteristics of this family. In this context, Sphaerospermopsis and Cylindrospermopsis are close related genera both molecularly and morphologically differing by 1) rounded akinetes adjacent to the heterocytes disposed along the trichome in Sphaerospermopsis; 2) apical heterocytes and akinetes separated by a few cells (2-3) in Cylindrospermopsis. Recently, during a survey on cyanobacteria from tropical Brazilian eutrophic lakes, strains with similarities to Sphaerospermopsis and Cylindrospermopsis were isolated. Aiming to elucidate the phylogenetic placement of these strains, we performed morphological, physiological and molecular studies. The Brazilian strains were confirmed to be closely related to Sphaerospermopsis and Cylindrospermopsis, but the phylogeny, based on 16S rRNA gene and 16S-23S rRNA intergenic region, clustered them in a well-defined clade separate from these genera. According to these results, we detailed the morphology, physiology, and phylogeny of the proposed new genus Amphiheterocytum, which showed potential to create blooms in tropical shallow lakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据