4.6 Article

Glassy Carbon Electrocorticography Electrodes on Ultra-Thin and Finger-Like Polyimide Substrate: Performance Evaluation Based on Different Electrode Diameters

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma11122486

关键词

glassy carbon; pyrolysis; neural implants; ECoG; conformability; polyimide; poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT)

资金

  1. Cluster of Excellence BrainLinks-BrainTools (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [EXC1086]
  2. PRIN grant
  3. Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glassy carbon (GC) has high potential to serve as a biomaterial in neural applications because it is biocompatible, electrochemically inert and can be incorporated in polyimide-based implantable devices. Miniaturization and applicability of GC is, however, thought to be partially limited by its electrical conductivity. For this study, ultra-conformable polyimide-based electrocorticography (ECoG) devices with different-diameter GC electrodes were fabricated and tested in vitro and in rat models. For achieving conformability to the rat brain, polyimide was patterned in a finger-like shape and its thickness was set to 8 mu m. To investigate different electrode sizes, each ECoG device was assigned electrodes with diameters of 50, 100, 200 and 300 mu m. They were electrochemically characterized and subjected to 10 million biphasic pulses-for achieving a steady-state-and to X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, for examining their elemental composition. The electrodes were then implanted epidurally to evaluate the ability of each diameter to detect neural activity. Results show that their performance at low frequencies (up to 300 Hz) depends on the distance from the signal source rather than on the electrode diameter, while at high frequencies (above 200 Hz) small electrodes have higher background noises than large ones, unless they are coated with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据