4.6 Article

Recovery of natural killer cells is mainly in post-treatment period in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 24, 期 40, 页码 4554-4564

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i40.4554

关键词

Direct-acting antivirals therapy; Hepatitis C virus; Natural killer cells; Natural killer subsets

资金

  1. National S&T Major Projects for Infectious Diseases Control [2017ZX10302201-004-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM To investigate how natural killer (NK) cells are affected in the elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) by sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, two highly effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). METHODS Thirteen treatment-naive and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients were treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, and NK cells were detected at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 during therapy, and week post of treatment (Pt)-12 and 24 after the end of therapy by multicolor flow cytometry and compared with those from 13 healthy controls. RESULTS All patients achieved sustained virological response. There was a significant decline in CD56 brIght NK cell frequencies at week 8 (P = 0.002) and week 12 (P = 0.003), which were altered to the level comparable to healthy controls at week Pt-12, but no difference was observed in the frequency of CD56(dim) NK cells. Compared with healthy controls, the expression levels of NKG2A, NKp30 and CD94 on NK cells from CHC patients at baseline were higher. NKG2A, NKp30 and CD94 started to recover at week 12 and reached the levels similar to those of healthy controls at week Pt-12 or Pt-24. Before treatment, patients have higher interferon (IFN)-gamma and perforin levels than healthy controls, and IFN-gamma started to recover at week 8 and reached the normalized level at week Pt-12. CONCLUSION NK cells of CHC patients can be affected by DAAs, and phenotypes and function of NK cells recover not at early stage but mainly after the end of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据