4.7 Article

Oil/water separation on structure-controllable Cu mesh: Transition of superhydrophilic-superoleophilic to superhydrophobic-superoleophilic without chemical modification

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 358, 期 -, 页码 416-426

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.11.061

关键词

Chemical treatment; Superhydrophilicity; Transition; Superhydrophobicity; Modifier-free; Durability; Oil/water separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51075184]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents [2017RCJJ016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four different surface morphologies, including needle-like, bamboo leaf-like, pine needle-like, and peony flower-like structures, were prepared on Cu mesh surface, and the existence of these different surface morphologies were due to the formation of Cu(OH)(2) or CuO microstructures by controlling the oxidation time and oxidation temperature of the chemical reaction. These freshly prepared Cu meshes all exhibit superhydrophilic-superoleophilic after dried with a hair dryer. They all have excellent separation efficiency, and the separation efficiency for oil-remove (similar to 96%) is higher than that of water-remove (similar to 94%). Interestingly, these meshes with four different surface morphologies can transform from superhydrophilic-superoleophilic to superhydrophobic-superoleophilic just after storage in air for > 20 days without any further chemical modification. This is because oxygen adsorption on the mesh surface contributes to air trapped into the microstructures. These superhydrophobic-superoleophilic copper meshes have good durability. According to the investigation of separation efficiency of the superhydrophobic-superoleophilic mesh, we find that the separation efficiency for oil-remove of the superhydrophobic-superoleophilic mesh (similar to 99%) is higher than that of the superhydrophilic-superoleophilic mesh (similar to 96%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据