4.7 Article

Insights into the influence of biomass feedstock type, particle size and feeding rate on thermochemical performances of a continuous solar gasification reactor

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 360-370

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.065

关键词

Concentrated solar energy; Biomass gasification; Spouted bed; Solar reactor; Thermochemical conversion; Synthesis gas

资金

  1. King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL), Thailand
  2. Campus France scholarship program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solar-driven steam gasification of different lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks was experimentally investigated with a 1.5 kW(th) continuously particle-fed solar reactor at high temperature using real high-fiux solar radiation provided by a parabolic dish concentrator. Experiments were carried out with five carbonaceous materials under different biomass feeding rates in the range of 0.8-2.7 g/min at 1300 degrees C in order to optimize the synthesis gas production and composition. Increasing biomass feeding rate (at constant slightly over-stoichiometric steam/biomass ratio) noticeably promoted the syngas yields that reached up to 83.2 mmol/g(biomass). The syngas yield (especially H-2) was more affected by the biomass feedstock (chemical composition) than by the particle size in the considered range (0.3-4 mm). The calorific value of the biomass was solar upgraded up to 24% through the syngas produced with a carbon conversion above 90%, thereby accomplishing efficient solar energy storage into the produced syngas. Increasing the biomass feeding rate inherently shortened the solar processing duration (for a given biomass amount). Thus, the solar energy input and the heat losses were reduced while the overall syngas production capacity was increased, which in turn drastically enhanced both the thermochemical reactor efficiency arid the solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency with maximum values typically beyond 25%. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据