4.5 Article

The Ferritin-Heavy-Polypeptide-Like-17 (FTHL17) gene encodes a ferritin with low stability and no ferroxidase activity and with a partial nuclear localization

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
卷 1850, 期 6, 页码 1267-1273

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.02.016

关键词

Ferritin; Ferroxidase center; Protein stability; Embryonic cell

资金

  1. MIUR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Three functional ferritin genes have been identified so far in mammals, and they encode the cytosolic Heavy (FTH) and Light chain (FTL) and the mitochondrial ferritin. The expression of a transcript by a fourth ferritin-like gene (Ferritin-Heavy-Polypeptide-Like-17, FTHL17) on the X chromosome was reported in mouse spermatogonia and in early embryonic cells. Methods: The intronless human FTHL17 gene encodes a protein with 64% identity to human FTH with substitution of key residues of the ferroxidase center. The gene was cloned into vectors for expression in Escherichia coli and mammalian cells, linked to a flag-tag. Results: The recombinant FTHL17 from E. coli purified as an assembled 24-mer ferritin devoid of ferroxidase activity and with a reduced physical stability. When transiently expressed in mammalian cells the flag-FTHL17 assembled in ferritin shells that showed reduced stability to denaturants compared with flag H and L ferritins. Immunocytochemistry with anti-flag antibody decorated the nuclei of flag-FTHL17 transfected COS cells, but not those of the cells transfected with flag-FTH or flag-FTL Conclusions: We concluded that FTHL17 encodes a ferritin-like protein without ferroxidase activity. Its restricted embryonic expression and partial nuclear localization suggest that this novel ferritin type may have functions other than iron storage. General significance: The work confirms the presence of a fourth functional human ferritin gene with properties distinct from the canonical cytosolic ones. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据