4.5 Article

Deep eutectic solvent as a green solvent for enhanced extraction of narirutin, naringin, hesperidin and neohesperidin from Aurantii Fructus

期刊

PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 156-163

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pca.2801

关键词

Aurantii Fructus; deep eutectic solvent; hesperidin; naringin; narirutin; neohesperidin

资金

  1. Innovation Project of College Students by Fujian Province [201710393011]
  2. Department of Education, Fujian Province [JAT170290]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction In the present study, a green and efficient extraction method using deep eutectic solvents as extraction solvent was developed for extracting the four major active compounds narirutin, naringin, hesperidin and neohesperidin from Aurantii Fructus. Methodology A series of tunable deep eutectic solvents were prepared and investigated by mixing choline chloride or betaine to different hydrogen-bond donors, and betaine/ethanediol was found to be the most suitable extraction solvent. To achieve the best extraction yield, the primary factors affecting the extraction efficiency, such as hydrogen-bond acceptor/hydrogen-bond donor ratio, water content in deep eutectic solvents, extraction temperature, solid/liquid ratio and extraction time, were investigated. Results The optimal extraction conditions were 40% of water in betaine/ethanediol (1:4) at 60 degrees C for heated extraction of 30 min and solid/liquid ratio 1:100 g/mL. Under the optimum extraction condition, the extraction yields of narirutin, naringin, hesperidin, and neohesperidin were 8.39 +/- 0.61, 83.98 +/- 1.92, 3.03 +/- 0.35 and 35.94 +/- 0.63 mg/g, respectively, which were much higher than those of methanol as extraction solvent (5.5 +/- 0.48, 64.23 +/- 1.51, 2.16 +/- 0.15 and 30.14 +/- 0.62 mg/g). Conclusion The present results showed that deep eutectic solvents could be promising green and efficient solvents for extraction of the bioactive ingredients from traditional Chinese medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据