4.4 Article

The dynamics of revascularization after white matter infarction monitored in Flt1-tdsRed and Flk1-GFP mice

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 692, 期 -, 页码 70-76

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.10.057

关键词

White matter infarction; Angiogenesis; Flk1; Flt1; Pericyte; VEGF; PDGF; Endothelial cell

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15H05934, JP15H03000, JP15K15448, JP17K10291, JP15K18371, JP18H02522]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subcortical white matter infarction causes ischemic demyelination and loss of brain functions, as the result of disturbances of the blood flow. Although angiogenesis is one of the recovery processes after cerebral infarction, the dynamics of revascularization after white matter infarction still remains unclear. We induced white matter infarction in the internal capsule of Flk1-GFP::Flt1-tdsRed double transgenic mice by injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1), a vasoconstrictor peptide, together with N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, and followed the changes in Flk1 and Flt1 expression in the vascular system in the infarct area. Reduction of Flt1-tdsRed-positive blood vessels 1 day after the injection and increase of Flk1-GFP-strongly-positive blood vessels 3 days after the injection were apparent. PDGFR beta-strongly-positive (PDGFR beta+) cells appeared in the infarct area 3 days after the injection and increased their number thereafter. Three days after the injection, most of these cells were in close contact with Flk1-GFP-positive endothelial cells, indicating these cells are bona fide pericytes. Seven days after the injection, the number of PDGFR beta+ cells increased dramatically, and the vast majority of these cells were not in close contact with Flk1-GFP-positive endothelial cells. Taken together, our results suggest revascularization begins early after the ischemic insult, and the emerging pericytes first ensheath blood vessels and then produce fibroblast-like cells not directly associated with blood vessels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据