4.8 Article

Probing Ligand-Induced Cooperative Orbital Redistribution That Dominates Nanoscale Molecule-Surface Interactions with One-Unit-Thin TiO2 Nanosheets

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 7809-7815

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03572

关键词

Nanosurface science; coverage effect; nanoscale cooperative chemisorption; TiO2 nanosheet; NEXAFS

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China [buctrc201812]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21431003, 21521091, 21590792, 91645203, 21801012]
  3. Public Hatching Platform for Recruited Talents of Beijing University of Chemical Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the general electronic principles underlying molecule surface interactions at the nanoscale is crucial for revealing the processes based on chemisorption, like catalysis, surface ligation, surface fluorescence, etc. However, the electronic mechanisms of how surface states affect and even dominate the properties of nanomaterials have long remained unclear. Here, using one-unit-thin TiO2 nanosheet as a model surface platform, we find that surface ligands can competitively polarize and confine the valence 3d orbitals of surface Ti atoms from delocalized energy band states to localized chemisorption bonds, through probing the surface chemical interaction at the orbital level with near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS). Such ligand-induced orbital redistributions, which are revealed by combining experimental discoveries, quantum calculations, and theoretical analysis, are cooperative with ligand coverages and can enhance the strength of chemisorption and ligation-induced surface effects on nanomaterials. The model and concept of nanoscale cooperative chemisorption reveal the general physical principle that drives the coverage-dependent ligand-induced surface effects on regulating the electronic structures, surface activity, optical properties, and chemisorption strength of nanomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据