4.6 Article

Valorization of Brewers' Spent Grain for the Production of Lipids by Oleaginous Yeast

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules23123052

关键词

Brewer's spent grain; oleaginous yeast; Rhodosporidium toruloides; organosolv; biodiesel

资金

  1. Bio4Energy, a strategic research environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brewers' spent grain (BSG) accounts for 85% of the total amount of by-products generated by the brewing industries. BSG is a lignocellulosic biomass that is rich in proteins, lipids, minerals, and vitamins. In the present study, BSG was subjected to pretreatment by two different methods (microwave assisted alkaline pretreatment and organosolv) and was evaluated for the liberation of glucose and xylose during enzymatic saccharification trials. The highest amount of glucose (46.45 +/- 1.43 g/L) and xylose (25.15 +/- 1.36 g/L) were observed after enzymatic saccharification of the organosolv pretreated BSG. The glucose and xylose yield for the microwave assisted alkaline pretreated BSG were 34.86 +/- 1.27 g/L and 16.54 +/- 2.1 g/L, respectively. The hydrolysates from the organosolv pretreated BSG were used as substrate for the cultivation of the oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides, aiming to produce microbial lipids. The yeast synthesized as high as 18.44 +/- 0.96 g/L of cell dry weight and 10.41 +/- 0.34 g/L lipids (lipid content of 56.45 +/- 0.76%) when cultivated on BSG hydrolysate with a C/N ratio of 500. The cell dry weight, total lipid concentration and lipid content were higher compared to the results obtained when grown on synthetic media containing glucose, xylose or mixture of glucose and xylose. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report using hydrolysates of organosolv pretreated BSG for the growth and lipid production of oleaginous yeast in literature. The lipid profile of this oleaginous yeast showed similar fatty acid contents to vegetable oils, which can result in good biodiesel properties of the produced biodiesel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据