4.5 Article

Exosomes derived from preadipocytes improve osteogenic differentiation, potentially via reduced miR-223 expression

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 951-958

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9760

关键词

exosome; microRNA; preadipocyte; miR-223; osteogenic differentiation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81700972]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insufficient bone volume remains a key issue when using dental implants. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) can accelerate bone healing when combined with dental implants. To improve the application of ADSCs for dental uses, the present study aimed to identify optimal implantation conditions. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes can induce naive stem cells to differentiate through the osteogenic lineage. In the present study, exosomes derived from 3T3L1 preadipocytes (3T3L1-exo) were purified and characterized. The effects and potential mechanisms of 3T3L1-exo on 3T3L1 cell ossification were examined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, western blotting, electron microscopy, RNA sequencing and histological analysis. The current study confirmed that 3T3L1-exo enhanced 3T3L1 preadipocyte osteogenic differentiation, as revealed by upregulation of osteogenic differentiation-associated genes and increased Alizarin Red staining. Furthermore, the microRNA (miR) expression profiles of 3T3L1-exo and 3T3L1 preadipocytes were sequenced and compared. The results of a further analysis demonstrated that miR-223 expression was reduced in 3T3L1 preadipocytes stimulated by 3T3L1-exo compared with in unstimulated cells. This finding suggested that 3T3L1-exo promoted 3T3L1 bone formation by decreasing miR-223 through a competitive mechanism, another miRNA, or another factor. The mechanism by which miR-223 is decreased warrants further investigation. In conclusion, the application of 3T3L1-exo may be useful for investigating preadipocyte-induced bone regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据