4.5 Article

Cordycepin induces Bax-dependent apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 901-908

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9717

关键词

cordycepin; antitumor activity; colon cancer; apoptosis; Bcl-2-like protein 4; p53

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Support Project [2014BAI02B00]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470375]
  3. National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [31501148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cordycepin, or 3-deoxyadenosine, is a derivative of the nucleoside adenosine. Initially extracted from the fungus Cordyceps militaris, cordycepin exhibits antitumor activity against certain cancer cell lines; however, the mechanism by which cordycepin counteracts colorectal cancer (CRC) remains poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to explore the underlying mechanisms of cordycepin against human CRC. To investigate the molecular mechanisms of cordycepin against colon cancer and in driving apoptosis, p53 and Bcl-2-like protein 4-null (Bax(-/-)) colon cancer HCT116 cell lines were used. Cell viability and growth were repressed in a dose-dependent manner in cells treated with cordycepin. Treatment with cordycepin resulted in increased apoptosis in HCT116 cells; however, flow cytometic analysis demonstrated that apoptosis was notably decreased in the Bax(-/-) HCT116 cell lines, but not in the p53(-/-) HCT116 cell lines. Furthermore, cordycepin exposure resulted in the translocation of Bax from the cytosol to the mitochondria and the subsequent release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria. Results from the present study demonstrated that cordycepin inhibited colon cancer cell growth in vitro and this appears to be through the endogenous Bax-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis pathway, which suggested a molecular mechanism for cordycepin against human colon cancer. These results indicated the possibility of cordycepin as a novel drug for the prevention of colon cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据