4.5 Article

Epistemic Entitlements and the Practice of Computer Simulation

期刊

MINDS AND MACHINES
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 37-60

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11023-018-9487-0

关键词

Computer simulation; Trust; Epistemology; Entitlements; Models

资金

  1. National Security Agency through the Science of Security initiative [H98230-18-D-0009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

What does it mean to trust the results of a computer simulation? This paper argues that trust in simulations should be grounded in empirical evidence, good engineering practice, and established theoretical principles. Without these constraints, computer simulation risks becoming little more than speculation. We argue against two prominent positions in the epistemology of computer simulation and defend a conservative view that emphasizes the difference between the norms governing scientific investigation and those governing ordinary epistemic practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Value judgments in a COVID-19 vaccination model: A case study in the need for public involvement in health-oriented modelling

Stephanie Harvard, Eric Winsberg, John Symons, Amin Adibi

Summary: This paper examines a COVID-19 vaccination model through the lens of philosophical literature, highlighting the social and ethical value judgments in health-oriented modelling. The research emphasizes the importance of making value judgements in health-oriented models explicit and inviting public engagement in the process.

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2021)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

Epistemic injustice and data science technologies

John Symons, Ramon Alvarado

Summary: Technologies that utilize data science methods can cause epistemic harms which can be unjust. It is important to recognize and address these harms. Through examples from the criminal justice system, workplace hierarchies, and educational contexts, we explain the types of epistemic injustices that can result from common uses of data science technologies.

SYNTHESE (2022)

Article Philosophy

Meaningfulness and Kinds of Normative Reasons

John Symons

Summary: Meaningfulness is the dimension of importance in adjudicating between competing normative reasons, where an agent's ranking of values reflects their understanding of meaningfulness. While some agents may not engage in such deliberation, their actions can still be prudentially valuable, aesthetically pleasing, and morally praiseworthy. Actions may be good in various ways yet still lack meaning.

PHILOSOPHIA (2021)

暂无数据