4.3 Article

A basic fibroblast growth factor slow-release system combined to a biodegradable nerve conduit improves endothelial cell and Schwann cell proliferation: A preliminary study in a rat model

期刊

MICROSURGERY
卷 38, 期 8, 页码 899-906

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/micr.30387

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background A basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) slow-release system was combined to a biodegradable nerve conduit with the hypothesis this slow-release system would increase the capacity to promote nerve vascularization and Schwann cell proliferation in a rat model. Materials and Methods Slow-release of bFGF was determined using Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA). A total of 60 rats were used to create a 10 mm gap in the sciatic nerve. A polyglycolic acid-based nerve conduit was used to bridge the gap, either without or with a bFGF slow-release incorporated around the conduit (n = 30 in each group). At 2 (n = 6), 4 (n = 6), 8 (n = 6), and 20 (n = 12) weeks after surgery, samples were resected and subjected to histological, immunohistochemical, and transmission electron microscopic evaluation for nerve regeneration. Results Continuous release of bFGF was found during the observation period of 2 weeks. After in vivo implantation of the nerve conduit, greater endothelial cell migration and vascularization resulted at 2 weeks (proximal: 20.0 +/- 2.0 vs. 12.7 +/- 2.1, P = .01, middle: 17.3 +/- 3.5 vs. 8.7 +/- 3.2, P = .03). Schwann cells showed a trend toward greater proliferation and axonal growth had significant elongation (4.9 +/- 1.1 mm vs. 2.8 +/- 1.5 mm, P = .04) at 4 weeks after implantation. The number of myelinated nerve fibers, indicating nerve maturation, were increased 20 weeks after implantation (proximal: 83.3 +/- 7.5 vs. 53.3 +/- 5.5, P = .06, distal: 71.0 +/- 12.5 vs. 44.0 +/- 11.1, P = .04). Conclusions These findings suggest that the bFGF slow-release system improves nerve vascularization and Schwann cell proliferation through the biodegradable nerve conduit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据