4.6 Article

Utilization of the validated Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool to identify signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis among those with psoriasis: a cross-sectional analysis from the US-based Corrona Psoriasis Registry

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15443

关键词

-

资金

  1. AbbVie Funding Source: Medline
  2. Amgen Funding Source: Medline
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Funding Source: Medline
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Funding Source: Medline
  5. Crescendo Funding Source: Medline
  6. Eli Lilly and Company Funding Source: Medline
  7. Genentech Funding Source: Medline
  8. Gilead Funding Source: Medline
  9. GSK Funding Source: Medline
  10. Janssen Funding Source: Medline
  11. Merck Funding Source: Medline
  12. Novartis Funding Source: Medline
  13. Pfizer Inc Funding Source: Medline
  14. Roche Funding Source: Medline
  15. UCB Funding Source: Medline
  16. Horizon Pharma USA Funding Source: Medline
  17. Valeant Funding Source: Medline
  18. Momenta Pharmaceuticals Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Despite increasing awareness of the disease, rates of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are high in patients with psoriasis (PsO). The validated Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) is a five-item questionnaire developed to help identify PsA at an early stage. Objectives To assess the risk of possible undiagnosed PsA among patients with PsO and characterize patients based on PEST scores. Methods This study included all patients enrolled in the Corrona PsO Registry with data on all five PEST questions. Demographics, clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcomes were compared in Corrona PsO Registry patients with PEST scores >= 3 and < 3 using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables; scores >= 3 may indicate PsA. Results Of 1516 patients with PsO, 904 did not have dermatologist-reported PsA; 112 of these 904 patients (12.4%) scored >= 3 and were significantly older, female, less likely to be working, and had higher BMI than patients with scores < 3. They also had significantly longer PsO duration, were more likely to have nail PsO and had worse health status, pain, fatigue, Dermatology Life Quality Index and activity impairment. Conclusions Improved PsA screening is needed in patients with PsO because the validated PEST identified over onetenth of registry patients who were not noted to have PsA as having scores >= 3, who could have had undiagnosed PsA. Appropriate, earlier care is important because these patients were more likely to have nail PsO, worse health-related quality of life and worse activity impairment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据