4.8 Article

Room-Temperature Chemical Solution Treatment for Flexible ZnS(O,OH)/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cell: Improvements in Interface Properties and Metastability

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 6709-6717

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b11028

关键词

GIGS solar cells; ZnS(O,OH) buffer; Cd-free buffer; interface; surface treatment; passivation; metastability; light soaking

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R. O. C. [104-3113-E-007-003-CC2]
  2. National Tsing Hau University, Taiwan, R. O. C. [104N2022E1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate an effective room-temperature chemical solution treatment, by using thioacetamide (S treatment) or thioacetamide-InCl3 (In-S treatment) solution, on Cu(In,Ga)Se-2 (CIGSe) surface to engineer the ZnS(O,OH)/CIGSe interface and junction quality, leading to enhanced efficiency and minimized metastability of flexible solar cells. The control device without treatment reveals a relatively low efficiency of 8.15%, which is significantly improved to 9.74% by In S treatment, and 10.39% by S treatment, Results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy suggest that S is incorporated into CIGSe surface forming CIGSSe by S treatment, whereas a thin In-S layer is formed on CIGSe surface by In-S treatment with reduced amount of S diffusing into CIGSe. PL spectra and TRPL lifetime further reveal that S incorporation into GIGS surface May substitute the O-Se and/or directly occupy the vacant anion site (V-Se), resulting in the effective passivation of the recombination centers at CIGSe surface. Moreover, reducing the concentrations of V-Se may thereby decrease the density of (V-Cu-V-Se) acceptors, which can minimize the metastability of ZnS(O,OH)/CIGSe solar cells. With S treatment, the light soaking (LS) time of ZnS(O,OH)/CIGSe device is reduced approximately to one-half of control one: Our approach can be potentially applied for alternative Cd-free buffer layers to achieve high efficiency and low metastability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据