4.8 Article

Lipid Cross-Linking of Nanolipoprotein Particles Substantially Enhances Serum Stability and Cellular Uptake

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 32, 页码 20549-20557

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b04609

关键词

nanoparticles; drug delivery; rHDL; NLP; DiynePC; serum stability; cross-linking

资金

  1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [15-LW-023]
  2. NIGMS [GM105404]
  3. DOE BER IDAT
  4. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
  5. UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
  6. [NCI R01CA155642]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanolipoprotein particles (NLPs) consist of a discoidal phospholipid lipid bilayer confined by an apolipoprotein belt. NLPs are a promising platform for a variety of biomedical applications due to their biocompatibility, size, definable composition, and amphipathic characteristics. However, poor serum stability hampers the use of NLPs for in vivo applications such as drug formulation. In this study, NLP stability was enhanced upon the incorporation and subsequent UV-mediated intermolecular cross-linking of photoactive DiynePC phospholipids in the lipid bilayer, forming cross-linked nanoparticles (X-NLPs). Both the concentration of DiynePC in the bilayer and UV exposure time significantly affected the resulting X-NLP stability in 100% serum, as assessed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) of fluorescently labeled particles. Cross-linking did not significantly impact the size of X-NLPs as determined by dynamic light scattering and SEC. X-NLPs had essentially no degradation over 48 h in 100% serum, which is a drastic improvement compared to non-cross-linked NLPs (50% degradation by similar to 10 min). X-NLPs had greater uptake into the human ATCC 5637 bladder Cancer cell line compared to non-cross-linked particles, indicating their potential utility for targeted drug delivery. X-NLPs also exhibited enhanced stability following intravenous administration in mice. These results collectively support the potential utility of X-NLPs for a variety of in vivo applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据