4.5 Article

Experimental investigation of hole cleaning in directional drilling by using nano-enhanced water-based drilling fluids

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 220-231

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.01.063

关键词

Directional drilling; Hole cleaning; Cuttings transport efficiency; Nano-enhanced drilling fluids

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  3. School of Engineering at the University of Aberdeen UK
  4. Contract Research DTD [PY2016/06266, PY/2017/01823, PY/2018/03001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inadequate hole cleaning often leads to challenges in drilling and well completion operations such as low rates of penetration, pipe sucking, losing tools, difficulties in liner/casing placements, etc. Designing a drilling fluid with improved rheological properties would be a solution to increase cuttings transportation efficiency. This study investigates the performance of nanosilica water-based drilling fluids for the hole cleaning process in directional drilling operations. Different inclination angles have been considered in a flow loop system with different rotational speeds (0 and 150 rpm) to simulate the drilling conditions in a wellbore. The performance of nano-enhanced drilling fluids in the cuttings removal process was compared with conventional water-based drilling fluids, and it was found that silica nanoparticles increased the cuttings transport efficiency in all experiments. The results indicated that the presence of nanosilica in the mud increased the colloidal interactions with cuttings and contributed to the improvements in cuttings transportation efficiency by 30.8-44% for different nano-enhanced water-based drilling fluids used in this study. The implementation of nanosilica in water-based drilling fluids showed promising results in the hole cleaning process which demonstrates the feasibility of using them in extended reach drilling operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据