4.6 Article

Gallbladder bile supersaturated with cholesterol in gallstone patients preferentially develops from shortage of bile acids

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 498-505

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.S091199

关键词

bile acid metabolism; bile physical chemistry/gallstone formation; cholesterol metabolism; gallstone formation; obesity

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2015-02781]
  2. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation [20160491]
  3. Stockholm County Council [20150447]
  4. Fondation Leducq
  5. Swedish Diabetes Foundation
  6. Cardiovascular Program, Karolinska Institutet/Stockholm County Council
  7. Swedish Research Council [2015-02781] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gallstone (GS) formation requires that bile is supersaturated with cholesterol, which is estimated by a cholesterol saturation index (CSI) calculated from gallbladder (GB) total lipids and the mol% (mole percent) of bile acids (BAs), cholesterol, and phospholipids (PLs). Whereas CSI indicates GS risk, we hypothesized that additional comparisons of GB lipid mol% data are inappropriate to identify why CSI is increased in GS disease. We anticipated that GB lipid mmol/l (millimole per liter) levels should instead identify that, and therefore retrieved GB mmol/l data for BAs, cholesterol, and PLs from a study on 145 GS and 87 GS-free patients and compared them with the corresponding mol% data. BA and PL mmol/l levels were 33% and 31% lower in GS patients, while cholesterol was unaltered. CSI was higher in GS patients and correlated inversely with GB levels of BAs and PLs, but not with cholesterol. A literature search confirmed, in 13 studies from 11 countries, that GB BA levels and, to a certain extent, PLs are strongly reduced in GS patients, while cholesterol levels are not elevated. Our findings show that a shortage of BAs is a major reason why GB bile is supersaturated with cholesterol in GS patients. These results are sustainable because they are also valid from a global perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据