4.5 Article

Comprehensive Characterization of 2 Immature Teeth Treated with Regenerative Endodontic Procedures

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 44, 期 12, 页码 1802-1811

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.007

关键词

Dentin formation; engineering; nerve regeneration; regenerative endodontic procedures; stem cells; tissue

资金

  1. Department of Endodontics Seed Funds (NBR) by University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
  2. CONICYT, Santiago, Chile [Fondecyt 1141281]
  3. National Institutes of Health [S10 RR025687]
  4. Office of the Vice-President for Research
  5. Department of Orthopaedics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Regeneration of the pulp-dentin complex is the penultimate goal of regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs). Histological outcomes have demonstrated reparative tissue formation in human teeth extracted post-REPs. However, lack of accurate characterization has precluded identification of the true nature of tissues formed post-REP. Methods: Here, we present 2 case reports of tooth #29 and #9 treated with REPs and demonstrate their clinical, radiographic, and histological outcomes. Results: Clinical outcomes revealed healing of apical periodontitis in both teeth and re-establishment of vitality responses in tooth #29. Moreover, radiographic assessments using 2D and 3D-volumetric analyses demonstrate considerable increase in root development for both teeth. Further, histological outcomes evaluated using Hematoxylin and Eosin and immuno-histochemical staining demonstrates presence of vascular and lymphatic structures as well as immune cell markers indicative of regeneration of an immuno-competent pulp. Lastly, examination of hard tissue deposition shows dentin-like tissue in parts of tooth #29 demonstrating for the first time, regeneration of a pulp-dentin complex post-REP. Conclusions: Collectively, this is the first study demonstrating recapitulation of several tissues commonly found as part of a pulp-dentin complex in teeth treated with REPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据