4.3 Article

In-situ growth hierarchical and superhydrophobic flower-like Cu3(PO4)2?2H2O nanosheets based on copper mesh for efficient oil?water separation

期刊

JOURNAL OF DISPERSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 12, 页码 1705-1714

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2018.1534594

关键词

In-situ growth; superhydrophobic and superoleophilic; capillary effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superhydrophobic porous membranes with interconnected open structures for effective treatment oily wastewater have gradually drawn researchers? attentions owing to frequent occurrence of organics leakage accidents. In this paper, we successfully fabricated superhydrophobic flower-like Cu-3(PO4)(2)?2H(2)O nanosheets on copper mesh surface via in-situ growth strategy and silane coupling agent (A151) hydrophobic modification. Specifically speaking, commercial copper mesh served as substrate and Cu could react with (NH4)(2)S2O8 and Na2HPO4, forming flower-like micro-nanostructure. As-synthesized materials were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) and X-ray diffractometer (XRD). In addition, chemical, mechanical stability and durability of as-prepared materials were also investigated under different condition. The relevant experiment results demonstrated that flower-like Cu-3(PO4)(2)?2H(2)O nanosheets successfully grew on copper mesh surface, resulting in the formation of rough structure. Modified copper mesh showed superhydrophobic and superoleophilic properties simultaneously with water contact angle (CA) of 151.24? and oil contact angle of 0?, respectively. The as-prepared materials could be used to separate oily wastewater with high separation efficiency (above 95.0%). The mechanism of oil?water separation was investigated in detail based on positive and negative capillary effect. High separation efficiency, excellent stability and durability of superhydrophobic copper mesh make it one of best promising separation candidates for wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据