4.2 Article

L-selenomethionine supplementation in children and adolescents with autoimmune thyroiditis: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12765

关键词

adolescents; autoimmune thyroiditis; children; l-selenomethionine; organic selenium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

What is known and objective Although a beneficial effect of selenium (Se) administration has been proposed in adults with autoimmune thyroiditis (AT), there is a paucity of similar data in children and adolescents. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether administration of a high dose of organic Se (200 mu g daily as l-selenomethionine) has an effect on antithyroid antibody titres in children and adolescents with AT. Methods Seventy-one (71) children and adolescents, with a mean age of 11.3 +/- 0.3 years (range 4.5-17.8), diagnosed with AT (antibodies against thyroid peroxidase [anti-TPO] and/or thyroglobulin [anti-Tg] >= 60 IU/mL, euthyroidism or treated hypothyroidism and goitre in thyroid gland ultrasonography) were randomized to receive 200 mu g l-selenomethionine or placebo daily for 6 months. Blood samples were drawn for measurement of serum fT4, TSH, anti-TPO and anti-Tg levels, and thyroid gland ultrasonography was performed at the entry to the study and after 6 months of treatment. Results and discussion At the end of the study, a statistically significantly higher reduction in anti-Tg levels was observed in the Se group compared to the placebo group (Delta: -70.9 +/- 22.1 vs -6.7 +/- 60.6 IU/mL, P = 0.021). Although anti-TPO levels were also decreased in the Se group, this change was not statistically different from that of the control group (Delta: -116.2 +/- 68.4 vs +262.8 +/- 255.5 IU/mL, P = 0.219). No significant difference in thyroid gland volume was observed between the two study groups (P > 0.05). What is new and conclusion In this original study, organic Se supplementation appears to reduce anti-Tg levels in children and adolescents with AT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据