4.7 Article

China's building stock estimation and energy intensity analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 801-813

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.060

关键词

Building stock; Provincial building energy intensity; Building energy consumption; Residential building; Commercial building; China

资金

  1. fundamental research funds for the Central Universities [2018CDJSK03XK02, 2018CDXYJG0047]
  2. Social Science and Humanity on Young Fund of the Ministry of Education P.R. China [15YJC630003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reliable and objective data regarding building stock is essential for predicting and analyzing energy demand and carbon emission. However, China's building stock data is lacking. This study proposes a set of China building floor space estimation method (CBFSM) based on the improved building stock turnover model. Then it measures China's building stocks by vintage and type from 2000 to 2015, as well as building energy intensity (national level and provincial level) and energy-efficient buildings. Results showed that total building stocks increased significantly, rising from 35.2 billion m(2) in 2000 to 63.6 billion m2 in 2015, with the average growth rate 4.0%. The deviations were well below 10% by comparing with China Population Census, which validated the reliability of CBFSM and the results. As for energy intensity, urban dwellings and rural dwellings showed relatively stable and increasing trend respectively. The commercial building energy intensity saw a downward trend during 12th Five Year Plan period. This indicated the effectiveness of building energy efficiency work for commercial buildings since 2005.38.6 billion m(2) residential dwellings and 5.7 billion m(2) commercial buildings still need to be retrofitted in future. CBFSM can overcome shortages in previous studies. It can also provide Chinese government with technical support and data evidence to promote the building energy efficiency work. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据