4.5 Article

Bio- and mineral acid leaching of rare earth elements from synthetic phosphogypsum Paul

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 491-496

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2018.12.034

关键词

Rare earth recovery; Bioleaching; Biohydrometallurgy; Mineral acid leaching

资金

  1. Critical Materials Institute, an Energy Innovation Hub - U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Advanced Manufacturing Office
  2. Rutgers Contracts [SC-13-394-436163, SC-18-475-123975]
  3. DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract [DE-AC07-05ID14517]
  4. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Contract [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leaching of six individual rare earth (yttrium, cerium, neodymium, samarium, europium, and ytterbium) doped synthetic phosphogypsum samples using a suite of lixiviants was conducted. The lixiviants chosen for this study were phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, gluconic acid, and a biolixiviant consisting of spent medium containing organic acids from the growth of the bacterium Gluconobacter oxydans on glucose. The biolixiviant had a pH of 2.1 and the dominant organic acid was determined to be gluconic acid, present at a concentration of 220 mM. The leaching behaviors of the studied lixiviants were compared and rationalized by thermodynamic simulations. The results suggest that at equivalent molar concentrations of 220 mM the biolixiviant was more efficient at rare earth element (REE) extraction than gluconic acid and phosphoric acid but less efficient than sulfuric acid. Unlike the organic acids, at pH 2.1 the mineral acids failed to extract REE, likely due to different complexation and kinetic effects. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据