4.7 Review

Mitochondrial quality control in cardiac cells: Mechanisms and role in cardiac cell injury and disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 234, 期 6, 页码 8122-8133

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27597

关键词

bcl-2-associated athanogene 3 (BAG3); cardiomyopathy; fission; fusion; ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury; mitochondrial quality control; mitophagy; proteasome

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health/NIH [P30MH092177]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL123093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria play an important role in maintaining cardiac homeostasis by supplying the major energy required for cardiac excitation-contraction coupling as well as controlling the key intracellular survival and death pathways. Healthy mitochondria generate ATP molecules through an aerobic process known as oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Mitochondrial injury during myocardial infarction (MI) impairs OXPHOS and results in the excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), bioenergetic insufficiency, and contributes to the development of cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, mitochondrial biogenesis along with proper mitochondrial quality control machinery, which removes unhealthy mitochondria is pivotal for mitochondrial homeostasis and cardiac health. Upon damage to the mitochondrial network, mitochondrial quality control components are recruited to segregate the unhealthy mitochondria and target aberrant mitochondrial proteins for degradation and elimination. Impairment of mitochondrial quality control and accumulation of abnormal mitochondria have been reported in the pathogenesis of various cardiac disorders and heart failure. Here, we provide an overview of the recent studies describing various mechanistic pathways underlying mitochondrial homeostasis with the main focus on cardiac cells. In addition, this review demonstrates the potential effects of mitochondrial quality control dysregulation in the development of cardiovascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据