4.7 Article

ENSA and ARPP19 differentially control cell cycle progression and development

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 218, 期 2, 页码 541-558

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201708105

关键词

-

资金

  1. Labex EpiGenMed
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche Investissement d'avenir program [ANR-10-LABX-12-01]
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale Equipes FRM 2015
  4. Ligue Contre le Cancer Equipe Labelisee
  5. Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  6. Fondation de France
  7. National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute [U01HG004085, U01HG004080]
  8. Sanger Institute
  9. University of California, Davis (CSD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Greatwall (GWL) is an essential kinase that indirectly controls PP2A-B55, the phosphatase counterbalancing cyclin B/CDK1 activity during mitosis. In Xenopus laevis egg extracts, GWL-mediated phosphorylation of overexpressed ARPP19 and ENSA turns them into potent PP2A-B55 inhibitors. It has been shown that the GWL/ENSA/PP2A-B55 axis contributes to the control of DNA replication, but little is known about the role of ARPP19 in cell division. By using conditional knockout mouse models, we investigated the specific roles of ARPP19 and ENSA in cell division. We found that Arpp19, but not Ensa, is essential for mouse embryogenesis. Moreover, Arpp19 ablation dramatically decreased mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) viability by perturbing the temporal pattern of protein dephosphorylation during mitotic progression, possibly by a drop of PP2A-B55 activity inhibition. We show that these alterations are not prevented by ENSA, which is still expressed in Arpp19(Delta/Delta) MEFs, suggesting that ARPP19 is essential for mitotic division. Strikingly, we demonstrate that unlike ARPP19, ENSA is not required for early embryonic development. Arpp19 knockout did not perturb the S phase, unlike Ensa gene ablation. We conclude that, during mouse embryogenesis, the Arpp19 and Ensa paralog genes display specific functions by differentially controlling cell cycle progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据