4.5 Article

Unique behavior of dermal cells from regenerative mammal, the African Spiny Mouse, in response to substrate stiffness

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 149-154

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.10.005

关键词

Mechanobiology; Wound healing; Acomys; Dermal fibroblast; Keratinocyte

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI BMMB 1636007]
  2. W. M. Keck Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The African Spiny Mouse (Acomys spp.) is a unique outbred mammal capable of full, scar-free skin regeneration. In vivo, we have observed rapid reepithelialization and deposition of normal dermis in Acomys after wounding. Acomys skin also has a lower modulus and lower elastic energy storage than normal lab mice, Mus musculus. To see if the different in vivo mechanical microenvironments retained an effect on dermal cells and contributed to regenerative behavior, we examined isolated keratinocytes in response to physical wounding and fibroblasts in response to varying substrate stiffness. Classic mechanobiology paradigms suggest stiffer substrates will promote myofibroblast activation, but we do not see this in Acomys dermal fibroblasts (DFs). Though Mus DFs increase organization of alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha SMA)-positive stress fibers as substrate stiffness increases, Acomys DFs assemble very few aSMA-positive stress fibers upon changes in substrate stiffness. Acomys DFs generate lower traction forces than Mus DFs on pliable surfaces, and Acomys DFs produce and modify matrix proteins differently than Mus in 2D and 3D culture systems. In contrast to Acomys DFs relaxed behavior, we found that freshly isolated Acomys keratinocytes retain the ability to close wounds faster than Mus in an in vitro scratch assay. Taken together, these preliminary observations suggest that Acomys dermal cells retain unique biophysical properties in vitro that may reflect their altered in vivo mechanical microenvironment and may promote scar-free wound healing. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据