4.6 Article

Influence of external head cooling on the head, core body and blood temperatures using 3D whole-body model

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/HFF-11-2017-0442

关键词

Blood temperature; Core body temperature; Exercise condition; External head cooling; Head temperature; Whole body model

资金

  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Pilot Research Project (NIOSH-PRP) Training Programme of the University of Cincinnati Education and Research Center [T42/OH008432-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of external head cooling on alleviating the heat stress in the human body by analyzing the temperatures of the core body (T-c), blood (T-blood) and head (T-h) during exercise conditions using 3D whole body model. Design/methodology/approach Computational study is conducted to comprehend the influence of external head cooling on T-c, T-blood and T-h. The Pennes bioheat and energy balance equations formulated for the whole-body model are solved concurrently to obtain T-c, T-blood and T-h for external head cooling values from 33 to 233 W/m(2). Increased external head cooling of 404 W/m(2) is used to compare the numerical and experimental Th data. Findings Significant reductions of 0.21 degrees C and 0.38 degrees C are observed in Th with external head cooling of 233 and 404 W/m(2), respectively. However, for external head cooling of 233 W/m(2), lesser reductions of 0.03 degrees C and 0.06 degrees C are found in T-c and T-blood, respectively. Computational results for external head cooling of 404 W/m(2) show a difference of 15 per cent in T-h compared to experimental values from literature. Originality/value The development of stress because of heat generated within human body is major concern for athletes exercising at high intensities. This study provides an insight into the effectiveness of external head cooling in regulating the head and body temperatures during exercise conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据