4.4 Article

Structure and Unfolding of the Third Type III Domain from Human Fibronectin

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 54, 期 44, 页码 6724-6733

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00818

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant [MCB-0846132, CHE-0321002]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant [P20GM103546]
  3. Murdock Charitable Trust
  4. W. M. Keck Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibronectin is a modular extracellular matrix protein that is essential for vertebrate development. The third type III domain (3FN3) in fibronectin interacts with other parts of fibronectin and with anastellin, a protein fragment that causes fibronectin aggregation. 3FN3 opens readily both as an isolated domain in solution and when part of fibronectin in stretched fibrils, and it was proposed that this opening is important for anastellin binding. We determined the structure of 3FN3 using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and we investigated its stability, folding, and unfolding. Similar to most other FN3 domains, 3FN3 contains two antiparallel beta-sheets that are composed of three (A, B, and E) and four (C, D, F, and G) beta-strands, respectively, and are held together by a conserved hydrophobic interface. cis-trans isomerization of P847 at the end of beta-strand C leads to observable conformational heterogeneity in 3FN3, with a cis peptide bond present in almost one-quarter of the molecules. The chemical stability of 3FN3 is relatively low, but the folding rate constant in the absence of denaturant is in the same range as those of other, more stable FN3 domains. Interestingly, the unfolding rate constant in the absence of denaturant is several orders of magnitude higher than the unfolding rate constants of other FN3 domains investigated to date. This unusually fast rate is comparable to the rate of binding of 3FN3 to anastellin at saturating anastellin concentrations, consistent with the model in which 3FN3 has to unfold to interact with anastellin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据