4.0 Article

The lifetime risk of pneumonia in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis at a mean age of 21 years: the role of spinal deformity surgery

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 357-364

出版社

BRITISH EDITORIAL SOC BONE JOINT SURGERY
DOI: 10.1007/s11832-015-0682-8

关键词

Cerebral palsy; Epilepsy; Neuromuscular; Scoliosis; Pneumonia

资金

  1. Turku University Central Hospital, Medtronic International

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Patients with neuromuscular disorders often have an increased risk of pneumonia and decreased lung function, which may further be compromised by scoliosis. Scoliosis surgery may improve pulmonary function in otherwise healthy patients, but no study has evaluated its effect on the risk of pneumonia in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Methods The patient charts of 42 patients (mean age 14.6 years) who had undergone surgery for severe NMS (mean scoliosis 86 degrees) were retrospectively reviewed from birth to a mean of 6.1 years (range 2.8-9.5) after scoliosis surgery. The main outcome was radiographically confirmed pneumonia as a primary cause for hospitalization. We excluded postoperative (3 months) pneumonia from the analyses. Results The lifetime annual incidence of pneumonia was 8.0/100 before and 13.4/100 after scoliosis surgery (p > 0.10). The mean number of hospital days per year due to pneumonia were 0.59 (SD 2.3) before scoliosis surgery and 2.24 (SD 6.9) after surgery (p < 0.10). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that lifetime risk factors for pneumonia were epilepsy (RR 15.2, 95 % CI 1.3-176.8, p = 0.027), non-cerebral palsy (CP) etiology (RR = 10.2, 95 % CI 3.2-32.7, p < 0.001) and major scoliosis ( main curve >70 degrees; RR = 11.3, 95 % CI 1.8-70.7, p = 0.01). Conclusions Epilepsy, non-CP etiology and major scoliosis are significant risk factors for pneumonia in patients with NMS. Scoliosis surgery does not decrease the incidence of pneumonia in patients with severe NMS. Level of Evidence Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据