4.4 Review

The local efficacy and influencing factors of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation in colorectal liver metastases: a review of a 4-year experience at a single center

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 36-43

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1528511

关键词

Ultrasound; percutaneous; microwave ablation; liver; metastases; local efficacy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and evaluate the influencing factors of local efficacy. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2017, 137 CRLM patients accepting US-guided percutaneous MWA were included. The 2450-MHz microwave ablation system and a cooled-shaft antenna were used. All patients were regularly followed up for at least 6months. Technical success, complete ablation, local tumor progression (LTP), complications and side effects were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent prognostic factors for LTP. Results: In total, 411 lesions (mean diameter 15.4 +/- 7.2 mm, range 5-67mm) were treated. Complete ablation was achieved in 99.27% (408/411) of lesions and 97.81% (134/137) of patients. LTP occurred in 5.35% (22/411) of lesions and 16.06% (22/137) of patients. LTP was more likely to occur in lesions larger than 3 cm in diameter (OR: 14.71; p<.001; 95% CI: 3.7 3-57.92), near a large vascular structure (OR: 7.04; p<.001; 95% CI: 2.41-20.60), near the diaphragm (OR: 4.02; p = .049; 95% CI: 1.05-16.11) and in patients with no response to chemotherapy before MWA (OR: 3.25; p = .032; 95% CI: 1.14-15.30). MWA was well tolerated, with a major complication rate of 3.65%, a minor complication rate of 8.03% and a mortality rate of 0%. Fever and pain were the most common side effects after MWA. Conclusions: US-guided percutaneous MWA of CRLM is a safe and effective method that is expected to become a routine treatment for local tumor control of CRLM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据