4.5 Article

Identifying 'firebreaks' to fragment dispersal networks of a marine parasite

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
卷 49, 期 3-4, 页码 277-286

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.11.005

关键词

Atlantic salmon; Lepeophtheirus salmonis; Aquaculture; Epidemiology; Graph theory; Network analysis; Node removal

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway through the Havbruk program [244439]
  2. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship
  3. Australian Postgraduate Training Research Scholarship (IPRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Marine ecosystems are beset by disease outbreaks, and efficient strategies to control dispersal of pathogens are scarce. We tested whether introducing no-farming areas or 'firebreaks' could disconnect dispersal networks of a parasitic disease affecting the world's largest marine fish farming industry (similar to 1000 farms). Larval salmon lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) are released from and transported among salmon farms by ocean currents, creating inter-farm networks of louse dispersal. We used a state-of-the-art biophysical model to predict louse movement along the Norwegian coastline and network analysis to identify firebreaks to dispersal. At least one firebreak that fragmented the network into two large unconnected groups of farms was identified for all seasons. During spring, when wild salmon migrate out into the ocean, and louse levels per fish at farms must be minimised, two effective firebreaks were created by removing 13 and 21 farms (1.3% and 2.2% of all farms in the system) at similar to 61 degrees N and 67 degrees N, respectively. We have demonstrated that dispersal models coupled with network analysis can identify no-farming zones that fragment dispersal networks. Reduced dispersal pathways should lower infection pressure at farms, slow the evolution of resistance to parasite control measures, and alleviate infection pressure on wild salmon populations. (C) 2019 Australian Society for Parasitology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据