4.6 Article

Soluble AXL is ubiquitously present in malignant serous effusions

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 152, 期 2, 页码 408-415

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.012

关键词

Soluble AXL; ELISA; Effusion; Ovarian carcinoma; Survival

资金

  1. Inger and John Fredriksen Foundation for Ovarian Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The objective of this study was to analyze the expression level and clinical role of soluble AXL (sAXL) in cancers affecting the serosal surfaces, with focus on ovarian carcinoma. Methods. sAXL protein expression by ELISA was analyzed in 572 effusion supernatants, including 424 peritoneal, 147 pleural and 1 pericardial specimens. Results. sAXL was overexpressed in peritoneal effusions compared to pleural and pericardial specimens (p < 0.001). sAXL levels were additionally significantly higher in effusions from patients with ovarian carcinoma, malignant mesothelioma and breast carcinoma compared to specimens from patients with other cancers (predominantly carcinomas of lung, gastrointestinal or uterine corpus/cervix origin) or benign reactive effusions (p < 0.001). sAXL was further overexpressed in high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC; n = 373) compared to low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC; n = 32; p = 0.036). In HGSC, sAXL levels were significantly lower in post-chemotherapy effusions compared to primary diagnosis pre-chemotherapy specimens (p = 0.002). sAXL levels in HGSC were unrelated to chemoresponse at diagnosis, progression-free survival or overall survival. Levels were similarly unrelated to survival in LGSC and breast carcinoma. Conclusions. sAXL is widely expressed in malignant effusions, particularly in ovarian and breast carcinoma and in malignant mesothelioma. sAXL is overexpressed in HGSC compared to LGSC and its levels are lower following exposure to chemotherapy. However, sAXL levels are not informative of chemoresponse or survival. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据