4.4 Article

A Phase II study of the safety and efficacy oflenvatinib in patients with advanced thyroidcancer

期刊

FUTURE ONCOLOGY
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 717-726

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0557

关键词

anaplastic; lenvatinib; medullary; radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer; thyroid carcinoma

类别

资金

  1. Eisai Inc., USA
  2. Eisai

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To investigate the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in advanced thyroid cancer. Patients/methods: In this Phase II study, 51 Japanese patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC), medullary thyroid cancer (MTC)or anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) received once-daily lenvatinib 24mg. The primary end point was safety. Results: All patients experienced 1 adverse event (AE); only one patient experienced an AE leading to discontinuation. The most common any-grade AEs were hypertension, decreased appetite, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue and proteinuria. Response rates for RR-DTC: 68%; MTC: 22%; ATC: 24%. Median progression-free survival for RR-DTC: 25.8months; MTC: 9.2 months; ATC: 7.4 months. Conclusion: Lenvatinib demonstrated a manageable safety profile, proven antitumor activity in RR-DTC and promising efficacy in MTC and ATC. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01728623 Lay abstract Lenvatinib is approved in Japan and elsewhere to treat radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer; however, new therapies are also needed for other forms of advanced thyroid cancer (such as medullary thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer). Fifty-one patients from Japan with advanced thyroid cancer received lenvatinib in this clinical trial. All patients experienced at least one side effect during treatment but only one patient experienced a side effect that necessitated stopping lenvatinib therapy. In general, patients tolerated lenvatinib treatment because the side effects were manageable. Lenvatinib treatment showed promising antitumor effects for patients across all thyroid cancer subtypes tested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据