Responsiveness of the PROMIS and FAAM Instruments in Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Population
出版年份 2018 全文链接
标题
Responsiveness of the PROMIS and FAAM Instruments in Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Population
作者
关键词
-
出版物
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 56-64
出版商
SAGE Publications
发表日期
2018-10-04
DOI
10.1177/1071100718799758
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Intensive Gait Training for Older Adults with Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
- (2015) Neil A. Segal et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION
- Psychometric Comparison of the PROMIS Physical Function CAT With the FAAM and FFI for Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes
- (2014) Man Hung et al. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
- The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency
- (2014) Matthias Rose et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Responsiveness and minimally important difference for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 20-item physical functioning short form in a prospective observational study of rheumatoid arthritis
- (2013) Ron D Hays et al. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
- The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative
- (2013) Jordi Alonso et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank Reduces Test Burden With Less Ceiling Effects Compared With the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients
- (2013) Man Hung et al. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
- Orthopaedic manual therapy, McKenzie method or advice only for low back pain in working adults: A randomized controlled trial with one year follow-up
- (2013) M Paatelma et al. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
- Item Response Theory, Computerized Adaptive Testing, and PROMIS: Assessment of Physical Function
- (2013) J. F. Fries et al. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
- Cross cultural adaptation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score with reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluation
- (2012) Michael R. Carmont et al. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
- Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures
- (2012) K. W. Wyrwich et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis
- (2012) JM Gregory et al. International Journal of Shoulder Surgery
- Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients
- (2011) Man Hung et al. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
- Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
- (2011) Isaline C. J. M. Eyssen et al. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
- The PROMIS of Better Outcome Assessment: Responsiveness, Floor and Ceiling Effects, and Internet Administration
- (2011) J. FRIES et al. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
- Evaluating the Correlation and Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Pain With Function and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Spine Surgery
- (2011) John DeVine et al. SPINE
- The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008
- (2010) David Cella et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index
- (2009) A. F. Mannion et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- The comparative responsiveness of the EQ-5D and SF-6D to change in patients with inflammatory arthritis
- (2009) M. J. Harrison et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
- (2007) Dennis Revicki et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started