4.7 Article

Comparisons of nutritional constituents in soybeans during solid state fermentation times and screening for their glucosidase enzymes and antioxidant properties

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 362-371

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.052

关键词

Soybean; Solid state fermentation; Tricholoma matsutake; Isoflavone; Antioxidant activity; Glucosidase

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science AMP
  2. Technology Development, Rural Development Administration (RDA) [PJ01133903]
  3. Technology Commercialization Support Program from Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Republic of Korea [315032-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research was the first to demonstrate the variations of nutritional constituents, glucosidase properties and antioxidant activities in soybeans during different solid state fermentation times (germination -> 5 periods for 12 days) with Tricholoma matsutake. Total isoflavones were significantly reduced (2661.54 -> 1559.04 mu g/g) with the increase of aglycone contents (107.61 -> 1285.66 mu g/g, 12 times) for fermentation, whereas amino acid and fatty acid slightly increased. Among them, daidzein (43.2 -> 43.6 -> 421.9 -> 721.4 -> 634.0 mu g/g), genistein (52.7 -> 24.4 -> 339.5 -> 546.6 -> 512.8 mu g/g) and glutamic acid (0.3 -> 1.7 -> 3.9 -> 6.6 -> 16.1 mg/g) markedly increased between germinated and fermented soybeans. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant abilities also considerably increased, especially, ABTS displayed the predominant scavenging capacities (33.1 -> 94.8%) at 200 mu g/ml, followed by DPPH (11.9 -> 87.0%) and hydroxyl (11.2 -> 49.2%) radicals. Interestingly, alpha-glucosidase inhibition (11.8 -> 84.9%) and beta-glucosidase (3.1 -> 40.3 unit/g) exhibited the highest activities after 9 days. Our results implied that fermented soybeans may be contributed to enhance the soybean value in nutrition and biological effect aspects to development of new functional foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据