4.7 Article

The combination of apolipoprotein E4, age and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale improves the prediction of amyloid positron emission tomography status in clinically diagnosed mild cognitive impairment

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 733-+

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ene.13881

关键词

ADAS-Cog; age; Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-PET; ApoE4 genotype; mild cognitive impairment

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant) [U01 AG024904]
  2. DOD ADNI (Department of Defense) [W81XWH-12-2-0012]
  3. National Institute on Aging
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  5. AbbVie
  6. Alzheimer's Association
  7. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  8. Araclon Biotech
  9. BioClinica Inc.
  10. Biogen
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  12. CereSpir Inc.
  13. Cogstate
  14. Eisai Inc.
  15. Elan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  16. Eli Lilly and Company
  17. EuroImmun
  18. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  19. Genentech Inc.
  20. Fujirebio
  21. GE Healthcare
  22. IXICO Ltd
  23. Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development LLC
  24. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC
  25. Lumosity
  26. Lundbeck
  27. Merck Co. Inc.
  28. Meso Scale Diagnostics LLC
  29. NeuroRx Research
  30. Neurotrack Technologies
  31. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  32. Pfizer Inc.
  33. Piramal Imaging
  34. Servier
  35. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  36. Transition Therapeutics
  37. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  38. Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Project [2018GSF118235]
  39. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [81571234]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose Randomized clinical trials involving anti-amyloid interventions focus on the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with proven amyloid pathology, using amyloid positron emission tomography (amyloid-PET) imaging or cerebrospinal fluid analysis. However, these investigations are either expensive or invasive and are not readily available in resource-limited centres. Hence, the identification of cost-effective clinical alternatives to amyloid-PET is highly desirable. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of combined clinical markers in predicting amyloid-PET status in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) individuals. Methods In all, 406 MCI participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database were dichotomized into amyloid-PET(+) and amyloid-PET(-) using a cut-off of >1.11. The accuracies of single clinical markers [apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) genotype, demographics, cognitive measures and cerebrospinal fluid analysis] in predicting amyloid-PET status were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A logistic regression model was then used to determine the optimal model with combined clinical markers to predict amyloid-PET status. Results Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-beta (A beta) showed the best predictive accuracy of amyloid-PET status [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.927]. Whilst ApoE4 genotype (AUC = 0.737) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) 13 (AUC = 0.724) independently discriminated amyloid-PET(+) and amyloid-PET(-) MCI individuals, the combination of clinical markers (ApoE4 carrier, age >60 years and ADAS-Cog 13 > 13.5) improved the predictive accuracy of amyloid-PET status (AUC = 0.827, P < 0.001). Conclusions Cerebrospinal fluid A beta, which is an invasive procedure, is most accurate in predicting amyloid-PET status in MCI individuals. The combination of ApoE4, age and ADAS-Cog 13 also accurately predicts amyloid-PET status. As this combination of clinical markers is cheap, non-invasive and readily available, it offers an attractive surrogate assessment for amyloid status amongst MCI individuals in resource-limited settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据