期刊
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 304-313出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.041
关键词
PM2.5; Indoor air pollution; Internal emission source; Dynamic change; Influencing factors
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [41390240, 41571130010, 41830641, 41821005]
- 111 program [B14001]
- Undergraduate Student Research Training Program of the Ministry of Education
Indoor air contributes significantly to overall exposure, particularly for rural Chinese who often use solid fuels for cooking and/or heating. Unfortunately, overlooked rural indoor air leads to a critical knowledge gap. Simultaneous measurements in the kitchen, living room, and immediately outside of houses using six-channel particle counters were carried out in 18 biomass-burning rural and 3 non-biomass-burning urban households (as a comparison) in winter to characterize dynamic change patterns indoor air pollution and indoor-outdoor relationship. The rural households mainly used wood or crop residues for cooking and heating, while the urban households used pipelined natural gas for cooking and air conditioners for heating. In rural households with significant solid-fuel burning internal sources, the highest concentration was found in the kitchen (101 +/- 56 mu g/m(3)), with comparable levels in the living room (99 +/- 46 mu g/m(3)) and low levels in outdoor air (91 +/- 39 mu g/m(3)). A generally opposite direction of indoor outdoor exchange was found between the rural and urban households. PM in kitchen air is smaller than that in living rooms and outdoors because solid fuel burning (mainly in rural households) and cooking oil heating (in rural and urban households). Indoor and outdoor PM concentration changed synchronously, with a slight delay in indoor air in urban households but a slight delay in outdoor air in rural households. Cooking, heating, and smoking elevated indoor PM significantly, but different from the cooking activity that produced peaks lasting for about 30 min, emissions from heating created a series of peaks due to frequent disturbance and fuel-feeding and had more significant impacts on the daily average concentration. Distinct indoor-outdoor relationships and dynamic change patterns between the two household categories w/o strong internal biomass burning sources imply that totally different model schemes are needed to quantitatively address indoor air pollution and inhalation exposure. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据