4.6 Review

A systematic review on global pollution status of particulate matter-associated potential toxic elements and health perspectives in urban environment

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 1131-1162

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10653-018-0203-z

关键词

Particulate matter; PTEs; Pollution; Emission; Health risk

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB238903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41672144, 41402133]
  3. Chinese Academy of Science (CAS), China
  4. World Academy of Science (TWAS), Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Airborne particulate matter (PM) that is a heterogeneous mixture of particles with a variety of chemical components and physical features acts as a potential risk to human health. The ability to pose health risk depends upon the size, concentration and chemical composition of the suspended particles. Potential toxic elements (PTEs) associated with PM have multiple sources of origin, and each source has the ability to generate multiple particulate PTEs. In urban areas, automobile, industrial emissions, construction and demolition activities are the major anthropogenic sources of pollution. Fine particles associated with PTEs have the ability to penetrate deep into respiratory system resulting in an increasing range of adverse health effects, at ever-lower concentrations. In-depth investigation of PTEs content and mode of occurrence in PM is important from both environmental and pathological point of view. Considering this air pollution risk, several studies had addressed the issues related to these pollutants in road and street dust, indicating high pollution level than the air quality guidelines. Observed from the literature, particulate PTEs pollution can lead to respiratory symptoms, cardiovascular problems, lungs cancer, reduced lungs function, asthma and severe case mortality. Due to the important role of PM and associated PTEs, detailed knowledge of their impacts on human health is of key importance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据