4.5 Article

Solving the Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problem Using the Multi-Objective Firefly Algorithm with a Constraints-Prior Pareto-Domination Approach

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en11123438

关键词

multi-objective optimal power flow problem; multi-objective firefly algorithm; constraints-prior Pareto-domination approach; quality indicator

资金

  1. Innovation Team Program of Chongqing Education Committee [CXTDX201601019]
  2. Chongqing University Innovation Team [KJTD201312]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51207064, 61463014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Known as a multi-objective, large-scale, and complicated optimization problem, the multi-objective optimal power flow (MOOPF) problem tends to be introduced with many constraints. In this paper, compared with the frequently-used penalty function-based method (PFA), a novel constraint processing approach named the constraints-prior Pareto-domination approach (CPA) is proposed for ensuring non-violation of various inequality constraints on dependent variables by introducing the Pareto-domination principle based on the sum of constraint violations. Moreover, for solving the constrained MOOPF problem, the multi-objective firefly algorithm with CPA (MOFA-CPA) is proposed and some optimization strategies, such as the crowding distance calculation and non-dominated sorting based on the presented CPA, are utilized to sustain well-distributed Pareto front (PF). Finally, in order to demonstrate the feasible and effective improvement of MOFA-CPA, a comparison study between MOFA-CPA and MOFA-PFA is performed on two test systems, including three bi-objective optimization cases and three tri-objective optimization cases. The simulation results demonstrate the capability of the MOFA-CPA for obtaining PF with good distribution and superiority of the proposed CPA for dealing with inequality constraints on dependent variables. In addition, some quality indicators are used to evaluate the convergence, distribution, and uniformity of the PFs found by the MOFA-CPA and MOFA-PFA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据