4.8 Article

Binocular Modulation of Monocular V1 Neurons

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 381-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institute [1R01EY027402-02, T32EY007135, P30EY008126]
  2. Vanderbilt Vision Research Center
  3. NIH [1 S10OD021771 01]
  4. Whitehall Foundation
  5. Knights Templar Eye Foundation
  6. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In humans and other primates, sensory signals from each eye remain separated until they arrive in the primary visual cortex (V1), but their exact meeting point is unknown. In V1, some neurons respond to stimulation of only one eye (monocular neurons), while most neurons respond to stimulation of either eye (binocular neurons). The main input layers of V1 contain most of the monocular neurons while binocular neurons dominate the layers above and below. This observation has given rise to the idea that the two eyes' signals remain separate until they converge outside V1's input layers. Here, we show that, despite responding to only one eye, monocular neurons in all layers, including the input layers, of V1 discriminate between stimulation of their driving eye alone and stimulation of both eyes. Some monocular V1 neurons' responses were significantly enhanced, or facilitated, when both eyes were stimulated. Binocular facilitation within V1' s input layers tended to occur at the onset of the visual response, which could be explained by converging thalamocortical inputs. However, most V1 monocular neurons were significantly reduced, or suppressed, to binocular stimulation. In contrast to facilitation, binocular suppression occurred several milliseconds following the onset of the visual response, suggesting that the bulk of binocular modulation involves cortical inhibition. These findings, combined, suggest that binocular signals arise at an earlier processing stage than previously appreciated, as even so-called monocular neurons in V1' s input layers encode what is shown to both eyes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据