4.7 Article

Extended water/cement ratio law for cement mortar containing recycled asphalt pavement

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 457-467

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.047

关键词

Strength; Workability; Mortar; Recycled asphalt pavement; X-ray powder diffraction; Scanning electron microscope

资金

  1. Rajamangala University of Technology Isan [NKR2561REV030]
  2. Thailand Research Fund under the TRF Senior Research Scholar program [RTA5980005]
  3. Suranaree University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research study, the strength development of cement mortar (CM) containing recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) as fine aggregate replacement for natural sand was investigated by means of strength, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy tests. The effect of the RAP replacement ratio, water to cement ratio (w/C) and curing time on strength development was evaluated. RAP had noticeably higher water absorption at saturated surface dry (SSD) state and slower rate of absorption than sand. The additional water to be compensated for the SSD state remained as the free water in the mix after hardening. RAP replacement at an optimum ratio of 25% increased the production of cementitious products and compressive strength for low w/C of <0.5, which was insufficient for cement hydration. While RAP replacement caused larger porosity and the production of lower cementitious products and compressive strength for high w/C of >0.5. Based on the critical analysis of the test results, the combined water (w*) parameter was defined as the sum of reacted water (w) and after-hardening unabsorbed water (w(u)). This parameter was used to generate the extended water to cement ratio law for prediction of strength development in RAP-CM. The outcome of this research will facilitate the mix design of RAP-CM at various RAP replacement ratios, w/C ratios and curing times. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据