4.3 Article

Demographic drivers of collapse in an island population of Tree Swallows

期刊

CONDOR
卷 120, 期 4, 页码 828-841

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-18-75.1

关键词

aerial insectivore; immigration; integrated population models; life table response experiments; population dynamics; recruitment; survival

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (OPUS award) [0816132]
  2. Bowdoin College
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [0816132] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diagnosing causes of population declines requires an understanding of the contributions of demographic vital rates to interannual variability and long-term changes in population size. At Kent Island, New Brunswick, Canada, an isolated population of Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) collapsed between 1987 and 2010, providing a unique opportunity to reconstruct how demographic rates drive population dynamics. We fit an integrated population model to 24 yr of population count, reproductive success, and capture-recapture data to generate annual estimates of productivity, juvenile and adult survival, immigration, and the finite rate of population change (lambda). The Kent Island population declined from 202 to 12 breeding adults over 24 yr, with a geometric mean decline of 11.6% per year. Annual apparent survival of adults averaged 56% across sexes, whereas annual survival and recruitment of juveniles never exceeded 6%. Transient life table response experiments revealed that variation in male and female immigration rates were the major contributors to both overall and interannual variation in lambda., followed by female and male adult survival. Local recruitment and reproductive rates had little effect on variation in lambda. Given broad-scale regional declines in Tree Swallows, our study shows how declines of isolated populations can be driven by reductions in immigration, especially when coupled with variation in adult survival and low local recruitment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据