4.7 Article

Molecular Classification of Lymph Node Metastases Subtypes Predict for Survival in Head and Neck Cancer

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1795-1808

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1884

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Career Award for Medical Scientists [1010964]
  2. NIH [R01DE027445-01]
  3. Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research
  4. Biological Sciences Division at the University of Chicago
  5. Institute for Translational Medicine/Clinical and Translational Award [NIH 5UL1TR002389-02]
  6. University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center Support Grant [NIH P30CA014599]
  7. NIH/NIDCR [R01DE027445-01]
  8. Institute for Translational Medicine, NIH/CTSA [5UL1TR002389-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: In advanced stage head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC), approximately half of the patients with lymph node metastases (LNM) are not cured. Given the heterogeneous outcomes in these patients, we profiled the expression patterns of LNMs to identify the biological factors associated with patient outcomes. Experimental Design: We performed mRNAseq and miRNAseq on 72 LNMs and 29 matched primary tumors from 34 patients with HNSCC. Clustering identified molecular subtypes in LNMs and in primary tumors. Prediction Analysis of Microarrays algorithm identified a 73-gene classifier that distinguished LNM subtypes. Gene-set enrichment analysis identified pathways upregulated in LNM subtypes. Results: Integrative clustering identified three distinct LNM subtypes: (i) an immune subtype (Group 1), (ii) an invasive subtype (Group 2), and (iii) a metabolic/proliferative subtype (Group 3). Group 2 subtype was associated with significantly worse locoregional control and survival. LNM-specific subtypes were not observed in matched primary tumor specimens. In HNSCCs, breast cancers, and melanomas, a 73-gene classifier identified similar Group 2 LNM subtypes that were associated with worse disease control and survival only when applied to lymph node sites, but not when applied to other primary tumors or metastatic sites. Similarly, previously proposed prognostic classifiers better distinguished patients with worse outcomes when applied to the transcriptional profiles of LNMs, but not the profiles of primary tumors. Conclusions: The transcriptional profiles of LNMs better predict outcomes than transcriptional profiles of primary tumors. The LNMs display site-specific subtypes associated with worse disease control and survival across multiple cancer types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据