4.4 Article

Activation of NF-κB signaling pathway during HCG-induced VEGF expression in luteal cells

期刊

CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 344-349

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cbin.11090

关键词

hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha; luteal cells; nuclear factor-kappa B; vascular endothelial growth factor

资金

  1. Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2016J01530, 2017J01626]
  2. Fujian Province Science and Technology Project of The Education Department [JAT160118]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Project of Xi Yuan Jiang Program [FZSKG2018002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an essential role in luteal angiogenesis, the present study therefore utilized luteal cells cultured in vitro to further investigate the activation and contribution of nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B to VEGF expression induced by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). The present results showed HCG induced VEGF expression as well as hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 alpha mRNA and protein expressions, which was blocked by NF-kappa B inhibitor pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC). Further analysis found that these increases of VEGF and HIF-1 alpha mRNA induced by HCG were also blocked by NF-kappa B siRNA transfection, which was consistent with PDTC treatment. However, HIF-1 alpha siRNA treatment significantly decreased HCG induced-VEGF expression with no effect on NF-kappa B mRNA expression. Furthermore, combination of HIF-1 alpha siRNA and PDTC treatment did not further decrease VEGF mRNA expression, and the result of chromatin immunoprecipitation indicated NF-kappa B may regulate HIF-1 alpha transcription through binding with its promoter. Taken together, the present results clearly demonstrated that NF-kappa B was activated to regulate VEGF expression by increasing HIF-1 alpha transcription in luteal cells treated with HCG. Therefore, the present study provided a new and important mechanism of luteal angiogenesis during the formation of corpus luteum in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据